Author summary
70% 17 analyzed articles/videos 894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cascade PBS Staff results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 945 hits . Analysis detected 4,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,491 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,356 of 6,629 authors). This Cascade PBS Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Cascade PBS Staff
Author details
Total words: 3,491
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score17 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.1% 27.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst