Cargill’s heavy-handed shutdown for union employees in Fort Morgan explains the rise in democratic socialism (Letters) 61%

By DP Opinion76%

7/22/2026, 11:01:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 688 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,592 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the article peer group.

Cargill lockout bodes poorly for America’s economy 
Re: “How do we survive?” 
July 19 news story 
Sunday’s front page article is like a headline from The Post in October 1929, a time when the rich lost control of their stock market. 
Assume, since private companies don’t report executive salaries, that Cargill’s CEO makes a modest $10 million to $50 million a year like many of today’s CEOs in publicly traded companies. 
And yet, the company isn’t willing to pay an hourly wage that exceeds the inflation rate. 
This means more workers can’t pay for healthcare, college, food, housing, energy and are being deprived of the “pursuit of happiness” cited in the Declaration of Independence  the people’s independence. 
No wonder terms like “democratic socialism” are fashionable, which is regulated capitalism as espoused by Adam Smith. 
Steve Morrow, Denver 
Firing Marrero is the right thing for DPS 
Re: “Don’t give Alex Marrero an early exit from DPS,” July 19 editorial. 
I was disturbed by your editorial suggesting that the current Denver Public School board allow Alex Marrero to continue as superintendent until his contract expires in 2028. 
You correctly assert that Marrero wants out of Denver. 
His recent job applications to Chicago and Miami are proof of that. 
In this case, two things cannot be true simultaneously: 1) clearly wanting out of a job, and 2) doing that job well when you haven’t done so previously. 
What the editorial does not address is that five of the current seven DPS board members never voted to hire him or to extend his contract. 
Thus, our current board now has one job to do with their one employee, Alex Marrero. 
Fire him. 
While he has played the role of a superintendent to his own benefit, he has clearly demonstrated, in my view, that he has not done the actual job, as your insinuations about his extensive travel point out. 
And don’t get me started on the abysmal literacy and math proficiency rates among our students of color. 
Will it cost some money for DPS to remove Marrero now? 
Probably. 
Will it be worth it in the long run? 
Absolutely. 
Jeffrey Wein, Denver 
RIP Pat Oliphant 
Re: “Remembering Pat Oliphant’s legacy in Denver,” July 19 guest commentary. 
I think of Pat Oliphant and instantly recall one thing  and it’s not any of the cartoons he drew over the decades that included the Watergate era, when he skewered Richard Nixon with relish and precision every day. 
This was the early 1970s in the old Denver Post building at 15th and California streets where Pat drew from a corner-window perch on the second floor overlooking the Denver Dry Goods Co. 
I was a clerk in the mailroom and twice a day delivered mail around the building. 
Occasionally, I would sneak a glimpse of the man when dropping mail off to Isabelle Truscott, the editorial department secretary. 
It was the smell of his pipe smoke that I remember, immediately and every time I encounter his memory. 
Very pungent, not sweet or fruity  it was nose-wrinkling, initially icky and instantly recognizable. 
When his book of Watergate cartoons was published, I took it to him and asked for his autograph. 
He signed it with a flourish, the inkblot dot over the letter “i” in his name particularly bold. 
RIP Pat Oliphant. 
Julie Hutchinson, Denver 
Let’s not equivocate  ICE detention centers are concentration camps 
Re: “ICE signs contract on $529M prison,” July 14 news story 
So, we are going to have another ICE detention center near Hudson, northeast of Denver. 
Why don’t we call these facilities by their real names, “concentration camps.” 
This is essentially what we have asked for by electing an anti-democratic and anti-American felon to the highest office in the land. 
Robert Ward, Highlands Ranch 
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more. 
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%DP Opinion: 6.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%DP Opinion: 2.7%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 4.4%DP Opinion: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%DP Opinion: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias4.5%This article: 10.2%DP Opinion: 7.7%Baltimore Sun: 4.3%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.1%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.1%This article: 1.2%DP Opinion: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Pessimism Bias1.2%This article: 23.4%DP Opinion: 12.8%Baltimore Sun: 7.6%Negativity Bias23.4%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%DP Opinion: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%DP Opinion: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%DP Opinion: 5.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Ad Hominem5.4%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.5%DP Opinion: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Appeal to Authority2.5%This article: 6.4%DP Opinion: 5.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%False Dilemma6.4%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%DP Opinion: 13.6%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.7%DP Opinion: 12.5%Baltimore Sun: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion15.7%This article: 4.1%DP Opinion: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 7.7%DP Opinion: 7.5%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.4%DP Opinion: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.4%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 29.9%DP Opinion: 10.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Anecdotal29.9%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%DP Opinion: 2.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%DP Opinion: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%DP Opinion: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 1.5%DP Opinion: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 20.2%DP Opinion: 12.6%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice20.2%This article: 8.0%DP Opinion: 3.3%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Indoctrination8.0%This article: 4.7%DP Opinion: 7.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.7%This article: 2.5%DP Opinion: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.5%This article: 6.0%DP Opinion: 2.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

688 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers1.9%attributed speech675writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Morrow • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Wein • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Hutchinson • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageRobert Ward • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robert Ward

0%flagged-word coverage
4 attributed words31% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.6 ptsWriter: 20.6%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Robert Ward: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.