Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video65.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Ward results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 173.525 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,290 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Ward is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Robert Ward
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 65.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.9%34.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos