Author summary
32% 5 analyzed articles/videos 564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atavia Reed results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 965 hits . Analysis detected 10,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,631 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,894 of 6,359 authors). This Atavia Reed is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Atavia Reed
Author details
Total words: 13,631
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst