Author summary
32%5 analyzed articles/videos564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atavia Reed results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 965 hits. Analysis detected 10,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,631 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,894 of 6,359 authors). This Atavia Reed is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Atavia Reed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Atavia Reed (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,631
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate