Vacant Englewood Site, Including Lot Once Owned By ‘Worst Landowner,’ To Become Apartments 46%

By Atavia Reed22%

7/20/2026, 1:00:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (12,018 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the article peer group.

WEST ENGLEWOOD  Two mixed-use apartment buildings will replace vacant land near the 63rd and Ashland Green Line station, including a lot once owned by the city’s “worst landowner,” officials announced Thursday. 
The $18 million project will transform two plots of city-owned land at 1516-19 W. 63rd St. and 1607-19 W. 63rd St. 
Each building will have 18 apartments, about 4,400 square feet of retail space and parking spaces for 20 bicycles. 
E.G. 
Woode , a collective of architects, designers and entrepreneurs led by architect Deon Lucas, will develop the two-site project. 
The South Side collective opened a commercial hub on the 63rd Street corridor in 2022. 
The E.G. 
Woode Food Hub , a $7.1 million dining development replacing a century-old building with two restaurants and a pop-up kitchen, is also moving forward on 63rd Street. 
“The project will provide what 63rd and Ashland needs, and that’s people: 36 households that will use the train station, patronize local businesses and contribute to community vitality and cohesion,” Ciere Boatright, commissioner at the city’s Department of Planning and Development, said in a news release . 
“These two buildings represent a major step forward for an intersection and transit station that’s been beset by vacant land for far too long.” 
E.G. 
Woode, a collective of architects, designers and entrepreneurs, will transform two vacant sites in West Englewood into mixed-use developments. 
Credit: Department of Planning and Development 
The site at 1515-19 W. 63rd includes a vacant lot the city acquired from the 2025 Hilco auction, the largest bulk land sale in the city’s recent history . 
City officials forced Suzie B. 
Wilson  dubbed Chicago’s “worst landowner” by city attorneys  and her sister, Swedlana Dass, to sell their real estate empire of vacant lots after reporting by Block Club Chicago and the Illinois Answers Project found the sisters had accumulated $15 million in city fines for rat-related violations at their hundreds of vacant lots. 
Many of the lots were on the South and West sides. 
The city sued Hilco, the company that ran the auction, for millions in February this year after the sale failed and many properties went unsold. 
City officials claimed the firm was negligent, incompetent and overvalued the land. 
Two properties of vacant land acquired during the Hilco auction near the forthcoming Red Line Extension project at 103rd and 111th streets are also part of current and pending development proposals, according to the news release. 
An $18 million mixed-use development will replace vacant land near a Green Line station in West Englewood. 
Credit: Department of Planning and Development 
The vacant West Englewood sites are valued at $100,600 and will be sold for $1 per lot, according to the news release. 
E.G. 
Woode plans to apply for the city’s Community Development Grant for up up to $5 million, according to the Thursday announcement. 
The land sale and grant will need approval from City Council. 
The city’s planning department released a request for proposals in 2025 for transit-oriented developments with mixed-income housing and retail space. 
Officials selected the E.G. 
Woode L3C proposal “based on the development concept and feasibility, as well as the team’s financial capacity and relevant experience, among other factors,” according to the news release. 
Wrought Iron Partners and architects Beehyyve L3C and Alligood Song will also help develop the project. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Atavia Reed: 2.7%Block Club Chicago: 1.9%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 5.1%Atavia Reed: 1.1%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Anchoring Bias5.1%This article: 12.2%Atavia Reed: 2.0%Block Club Chicago: 2.5%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Atavia Reed: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias5.0%This article: 27.5%Atavia Reed: 4.8%Block Club Chicago: 3.1%Framing Effect27.5%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Atavia Reed: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Atavia Reed: 4.0%Block Club Chicago: 4.4%Optimism Bias11.9%This article: 8.7%Atavia Reed: 1.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 23.9%Atavia Reed: 6.9%Block Club Chicago: 5.4%Negativity Bias23.9%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 2.9%Block Club Chicago: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Atavia Reed: 2.1%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Atavia Reed: 1.9%Block Club Chicago: 3.4%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.1%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 1.5%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.1%Atavia Reed: 1.5%Block Club Chicago: 2.4%Appeal to Authority10.1%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 1.8%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 2.2%Block Club Chicago: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.8%Atavia Reed: 6.2%Block Club Chicago: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion27.8%This article: 8.3%Atavia Reed: 0.9%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Begging the Question8.3%This article: 16.7%Atavia Reed: 2.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.7%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 1.8%Block Club Chicago: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Atavia Reed: 1.1%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.4%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.7%Atavia Reed: 1.1%Block Club Chicago: 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.7%This article: 8.3%Atavia Reed: 1.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.3%This article: 11.9%Atavia Reed: 1.1%Block Club Chicago: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice11.9%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.3%Block Club Chicago: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Atavia Reed: 4.4%Block Club Chicago: 3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

564 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech375writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWoode • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWoode • 27 words • 0.0% coverageCiere Boatright • 47 words • 100.0% coverageCiere Boatright • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWoode • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Planning and Development • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Planning and Development • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWoode • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Planning and Development • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ciere Boatright

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words38% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Quote-first Misdirection+66.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ciere Boatright: 66.2%66.2%Biased Writer Voice-17.9 ptsWriter: 17.9%Ciere Boatright: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Ciere Boatright: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.