Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video106.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ciere Boatright results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.1% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 431.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,521 of 28,364 speakers). This Ciere Boatright is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Ciere Boatright
Speaker details
Total words: 106.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
41.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos106.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.1%83.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 58.5%58.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 58.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos