Author summary
63%1 analyzed article/video727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Cook results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 2,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,271 of 6,353 authors). This Sara Cook is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Sara Cook
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
80%Sara Cook (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,181
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.1%3.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 21.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos