Detroit Evening Report: How wildfire smoke choked the Michigan economy 43%

By Hernz Laguerre40%

7/22/2026, 8:37:53 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 532 faulty-reasoning hits from 594 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,587 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the article peer group.

The wildfire smoke that covered Michigan skies is costing the state money. 
According to an Analysis from an East Lansing based Anderson Economic Group, the smoke cost the state’s economy $4 billion in losses. 
We are second only to the state of New York which estimated a $5 billion loss. 
The firm said that Michigan had the largest impact based on the size of its economy. 
Proximity could be the reason why. 
How did this happen? 
Well, industries that rely on outdoor work like transportation and construction contributed to these losses greatly. 
Outdoor events and attractions closed as well which also points to a decrease in tourism and fewer customers at businesses that depend on the outdoors. 
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources had to tell campers with reservations that they should cancel. 
They also waived cancellation fees and issued refunds. 
But the losses may be ending soon as it appears the smoky haze has lifted. 
As of Wednesday, the Air Now’s Air Quality index showed the air quality was between 0-50 which means the air in Michigan is in a good range. 
At one point last week, Michigan was rated the most polluted air quality in the world with Detroit’s air quality index at 724—for reference, anything over 301 is hazardous. 
According to the Michigan Department of Environment Great Lakes and Energy as the weather system moves about the improvements are expected to continue. 
To stay up to date on air quality, you can check EGLE’s MiAir Quality Index Dashboard or use the US Air Quality Index called Air Now. 
Additional headlines for Wednesday, July 22, 2026 
Global company joins Detroit’s downtown 
A company from Japan is planting their roots in Detroit. 
The company Nagase America opened their Mobility Solutions office in downtown Detroit. 
According to the publicly traded company, they will provide innovative materials and components that enhance vehicle comfort, performance, and efficiency. 
In a YouTube Short video, Mayor Sheffield describes how this move will expand Detroit’s global reach. 
“Today sends a powerful message that a global company with nearly 190 years worth of experience had many choices where they could go and grow and expand. 
You could’ve expanded anywhere but you chose our talent our downtown and our future. 
It speaks volume of the confidence you have in our city. 
Your decision brings you closer to more customers, partners and innovators while strengthen Detroit’s position as a global mobility hub.” 
The company says it plans to use Detroit as a long-term strategic foundation for its North American mobility operations. 
Detroit’s 325th birthday 
And the 3-1-3 is turning 3-2-5. 
July 24th marks the city’s 325th anniversary. 
You might be thinking, how is that possible? 
America just turned 250 years old! 
Well, it was originally founded French explorer Antoine de la Mothe Cadillac in 1701. 
Detroit transitioned from French to British control in 1760, and later became part of the United States following the American Revolution. 
The Detroit Historical Society is celebrating the milestone in conjunction with anniversaries for the Detroit Historical Museum and Dossin Great Lakes Museum. 
The Detroit Historical Society will host a daylong community block party on Friday, July 24 with free admission to the museum. 
And the Dossin takes the baton and continues the fun on Saturday, July 25, a maritime-themed “dock” party that will also include family activities, music, ice cream, food trucks and free museum admission. 
Listen to the latest episode of the “Detroit Evening Report” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, NPR.org or wherever you get your podcasts. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 2.4%WDET: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Hernz Laguerre: 1.1%WDET: 0.4%Anchoring Bias7.6%This article: 4.2%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 2.3%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 3.7%Hernz Laguerre: 1.0%WDET: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 1.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.4%WDET: 0.2%Hindsight Bias1.0%This article: 2.7%Hernz Laguerre: 0.5%WDET: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 7.1%Hernz Laguerre: 8.1%WDET: 4.7%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.7%WDET: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Hernz Laguerre: 7.3%WDET: 3.5%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 1.3%Hernz Laguerre: 1.5%WDET: 0.9%Pessimism Bias1.3%This article: 9.6%Hernz Laguerre: 3.9%WDET: 3.4%Negativity Bias9.6%This article: 2.4%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Hernz Laguerre: 1.3%WDET: 1.2%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Hernz Laguerre: 2.7%WDET: 5.6%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Hernz Laguerre: 2.1%WDET: 0.9%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 1.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.1%WDET: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.6%Hernz Laguerre: 4.3%WDET: 3.3%Appeal to Authority13.6%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 3.8%WDET: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.4%Hernz Laguerre: 0.8%WDET: 0.6%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 10.3%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.3%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.7%WDET: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.4%WDET: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.3%WDET: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 3.1%WDET: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.6%WDET: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Hernz Laguerre: 7.0%WDET: 7.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.9%

594 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers26%attributed speech442writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Department of Natural Resources • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Department of Natural Resources • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Department of Environment Great Lakes and Energy • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNagase America • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Sheffield • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Sheffield • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Sheffield • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Sheffield • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDetroit Historical Society • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mayor Sheffield

100%flagged-word coverage
72 attributed words47% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Mayor Sheffield: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.