Speaker summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 188.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Sheffield results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 72 hits . Analysis detected 498.769 faulty-reasoning hits from 188.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,931 of 28,364 speakers). This Mayor Sheffield is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Mayor Sheffield
Speaker details
Total words: 188.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 13.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos188.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst