Topic summary
56% 47 analyzed articles/videos 33,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Impact results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 13,818 hits . Analysis detected 135,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 147,167 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,306 of 16,542 topics). This Economic Impact is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Economic Impact
Topic details
Total words: 147,167
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score47 analyzed articles147.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 57% 7/25/2026, 3:46:37 AM