Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 1,439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Knowles results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 681 hits . Analysis detected 4,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,447 of 6,499 authors). This Caroline Knowles is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Caroline Knowles
Author details
Total words: 4,317
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst