Publication summary
62% 22 analyzed articles/videos 6,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KTVU results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 2,218 hits . Analysis detected 21,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,670 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (251 of 398 publications). This KTVU is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 27,670
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score22 analyzed articles27.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 62% 7/24/2026, 4:54:58 AM
KTVU 62% 7/23/2026, 10:32:17 PM
KTVU 62% 7/23/2026, 9:26:31 PM
KTVU 62% 7/22/2026, 10:37:26 PM
KTVU 62% 7/22/2026, 10:24:56 PM
KTVU 62% 7/22/2026, 10:24:01 PM
KTVU 62% 7/22/2026, 3:34:44 AM
KTVU 62% 7/22/2026, 1:38:13 AM