East Bay middle school students create and showcase businesses at FabLab camp 5%

By Jana Katsuyama0%

7/23/2026, 5:59:21 PM

Keywords: Richmond

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 187 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,960 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the article peer group.

Start-up businesses are taking over Kennedy High School on Thursday as students showcased the businesses they designed, budgeted and manufactured for their last day of the FabLab SparkForce Summer Camp in Richmond. 
Twenty-nine middle school students in grades 6–8 from across the West Contra Costa Unified School District have spent the last two weeks at summer camp not learning about building canoes or friendship bracelets, but instead learning about business planning and digital manufacturing. 
The experience has led to each student designing their own mobile truck concept and laser-cutting their own 3D-designed key chains. 
An eighth grader named Philip described to KTVU what his mobile truck business does. 
"We would tell you what to do when you encounter an animal or if you want to put it back where it was or help it. 
This truck would serve that purpose," he said. 
According to the WCCUSD news release, the FabLab SparkForce Summer Camp is a part of SparkForce's National Building Giants initiative that works to introduce students ages 12 to 16 to careers in maritime manufacturing with hands-on project-based learning. 
"We asked them, identify a problem in your community, and they really took it seriously," said the WCCUSD education services coordinator John Iwawaki. 
David Solomon, a sixth grade student, said that a problem he found was inaccessibility to technology. 
"Technology is necessary," he said. 
"So, I thought, how about I send out a little rental truck to rent technology to people?" 
Students created and presented their ideas, such as a mobile pharmacy convenience store that delivers goods to places in Richmond where the stores have closed. 
Seventh-grader Alliyah described her solution to this issue. 
"Most of the things you need are in regular shops, like CVS or 7-Eleven or that kind of stuff, so I thought this would be more a necessities kind of thing." 
This year is a first-time partnership with the U.S. 
Navy Submarine program and SparkForce, which provided a $20,000 grant. 
Cheryl Cotton, the superintendent of WCCUSD, said that it's not just about the money, it's about providing these kids with varying experiences and careers. 
"It's not just philanthropic dollars, it's not just the funding," she said. 
"It's also allowing our kids to have exposure." 
With this summer camp, students are taken on field trips with instructors to places such as the Rosie the Riveter Museum and other maritime sites, opening the doors to a wide range of careers. 
It has also provided students with the opportunity to create projects they've never tried before. 
"Now with the camp and with all the technology, computer here, printer there, laser cutter there, vinyl cutter there and other stuff, I think I can do it," David said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Jana Katsuyama: 2.5%KTVU: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 3.1%KTVU: 6.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Jana Katsuyama: 3.4%KTVU: 6.0%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 5.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Jana Katsuyama: 1.7%KTVU: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Jana Katsuyama: 2.8%KTVU: 4.0%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 2.6%Jana Katsuyama: 0.9%KTVU: 0.9%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.3%Jana Katsuyama: 1.1%KTVU: 2.7%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 7.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 3.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.7%Jana Katsuyama: 1.9%KTVU: 2.7%Unattributed Quote5.7%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jana Katsuyama: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jana Katsuyama: 1.8%KTVU: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.4%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers59%attributed speech189writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePhilip • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePhilip • 26 words • 100.0% coveragePhilip • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWCCUSD • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Iwawaki • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Solomon • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Solomon • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Solomon • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageAlliyah • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAlliyah • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSparkForce • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCheryl Cotton • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCheryl Cotton • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCheryl Cotton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavid • 30 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

WCCUSD

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words14% of attributed speech21% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.2 ptsWriter: 13.2%WCCUSD: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.