Author summary
67% 3 analyzed articles/videos 676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theo Wells-Spackman results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 7,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,289 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,214 of 6,215 authors). This Theo Wells-Spackman is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Theo Wells-Spackman
Author details
Total words: 11,289
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst