Publication summary
20% 33 analyzed articles/videos 19,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These VTDigger results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 5,460 hits . Analysis detected 71,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 103,676 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (324 of 400 publications). This VTDigger is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 103,676
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score33 analyzed articles103.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst