Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Stannard results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 515 hits . Analysis detected 3,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,652 of 6,485 authors). This Bob Stannard is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Bob Stannard
Author details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst