Author summary
ā 92% 1 analyzed article/video 608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Goodman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 1,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ā 77% (1,510 of 6,416 authors). This David Goodman is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. David Goodman
Author details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Straw Man: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst