Author summary
98% 5 analyzed articles/videos 359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Ruberry results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.1% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 4,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,743 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (329 of 6,628 authors). This Brendan Ruberry is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Brendan Ruberry
Author details
Total words: 1,743
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.1% percentile 10.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 44.1% 44.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 18.5% 18.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 17.0% 17.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.6% 19.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 13.5% 13.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.2% 9.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 32.9% 32.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 44.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 32.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 18.5%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.5%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst