Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Walz results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 996 hits. Analysis detected 7,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,525 of 16,562 topics). This Tim Walz is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Tim Walz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
6.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.5%35.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 18.2%18.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.3%17.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos