Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Penley results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 2,759 hits . Analysis detected 23,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,153 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,741 of 6,362 authors). This Taylor Penley is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Taylor Penley
Author details
Total words: 13,153
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.0% 21.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst