Top Trump economist calls new inflation data ‘blockbuster,’ says economy mirrors first-term gains0%

By Taylor Penley0%

12/20/2025, 1:42:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 734 faulty-reasoning hits from 363 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett praised Thursday’s consumer price index (CPI) report, which showed inflation rose less than expected. 
"It was just an absolute blockbuster report," Hassett told "Varney & Co." 
"Before the numbers come out, we look at the forecast from everybody we can find on Bloomberg." 
We've looked at 61 forecasts, and this number came in better than every single one of them," he added. 
Hassett continued, honing in on the near-term trajectory. 
He added that core inflation, when averaged over the past three months and annualized, is running at just 1.6%, which he argued reflects the success of the Trump administration’s efforts to boost aggregate supply and push prices lower. 
"We've got high growth, and we have core inflation running at 1.6% if you look at the last quarter, and I think that's about where we should be," he said. 
"And don't forget, that's where we were last time in President Trump's first term." 
We were growing in the 3% range, and we had inflation in the 1% range, and it looks like that's where we are again," he said. 
"I'm not saying we're going to declare victory yet on the price problem, but this is just an astonishingly good CPI report," he added. 
The Bureau of Labor Statistics said Thursday that the CPI, a broad measure of how much everyday goods like gasoline, groceries and rent cost, rose 0.2% over the two months from September to November, while it increased to 2.7% on a year-over-year basis. 
Both figures were cooler than the expectations of economists polled by LSEG, who projected a 0.3% monthly rise and a 3.1% year-over-year figure. 
Core prices, which exclude volatile measurements of gasoline and food to better assess price growth trends, were up 0.3% from the prior month and 2.6% year over year, a figure in line with economists' expectations. 
Consumers, however, are still feeling the pinch of prices as the report indicates a 2.6% increase in the cost of food compared with a year ago. 
Other areas, such as energy, transportation and housing are also higher than a year ago, per the report. 
FOX Business' Eric Revell contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%Taylor Penley: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias15.4%This article: 7.2%Taylor Penley: 4.9%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Taylor Penley: 7.1%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 41.0%Taylor Penley: 21.0%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect41.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 12.1%Taylor Penley: 14.9%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias12.1%This article: 36.6%Taylor Penley: 7.1%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias36.6%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 3.3%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Taylor Penley: 9.6%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 3.8%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Taylor Penley: 3.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.2%This article: 16.5%Taylor Penley: 7.2%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias16.5%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 4.8%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 12.5%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.5%Taylor Penley: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question10.5%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Taylor Penley: 14.8%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization7.2%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 10.5%Taylor Penley: 3.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.5%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 10.5%Taylor Penley: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading10.5%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Taylor Penley: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

363 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.