Topic summary
68% 65 analyzed articles/videos 45,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 26,599 hits . Analysis detected 268,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 261,956 analyzed words across 65 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,656 of 15,689 topics). This Economic Policy is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Economic Policy
Topic details
Total words: 261,956
Article count: 65
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score65 analyzed articles262K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst