Publication summary
77% 29 analyzed articles/videos 17,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compact results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 18,808 hits . Analysis detected 168,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 143,543 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 60% (163 of 398 publications). This Compact is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 143,543
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score29 analyzed articles143.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 13.1% 13.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst