Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lewis Andrews results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 3,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,279 authors). This Lewis Andrews is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lewis Andrews
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Lewis Andrews (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,068
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 47.5%47.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 40.9%40.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 21.7%21.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.4%17.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 13.3%13.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 22.0%22.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 47.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 22.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 12.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos