Publication summary
78% 28 analyzed articles/videos 15,889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compact results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 18,393 hits . Analysis detected 164,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 138,992 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 61% (152 of 385 publications). This Compact is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 138,992
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score28 analyzed articles139K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst