Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christopher Wood results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Christopher Wood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Wood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Christopher Wood (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,536
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos