Author summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Kavanagh results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 608 hits . Analysis detected 4,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,824 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,161 of 6,275 authors). This Jennifer Kavanagh is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Jennifer Kavanagh
Author details
Total words: 3,824
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst