Author summary
â 49% 1 analyzed article/video 1,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruna Frascolla results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 355 hits . Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,759 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of â 32% (4,562 of 6,628 authors). This Bruna Frascolla is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Bruna Frascolla
Author details
Total words: 3,759
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst