Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 1,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,859 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,126 of 6,362 authors). This MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 2,859
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst