BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Anecdotal, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 722 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.7% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,684 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the article peer group.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani provides a defining example of real-world democratic socialism by appointing both Anthony Shorris and Lina Khan to jointly head the city’s Economic Development Corporation (EDC). 
Shorris’s resume includes not just his work at McKinsey, the world’s foremost corporate consultant, but also being first deputy mayor under Bill de Blasio and having led the Port Authority (where he kicked out every lobbyist ); Khan chaired President Biden’s Federal Trade Commission, where she led the administration’s anti-monopoly initiatives. 
Khan will chair the EDC board; Shorris will be its president. 
Historically, the city’s Economic Development Corporation has promoted such major projects as Hudson Yards, which includes, or will include when completed, a number of office skyscrapers and a cultural center between Penn Station and the Hudson River. 
The EDC’s progressive critics have argued that most of the developments it has spurred in recent decades chiefly benefit the city’s business interests; The New York Times quoted a local DSA leader who called it “a concierge service for a small number of wealthy New Yorkers.” 
By that standard, the EDC is inherently at odds with Mamdani’s mandate for, among other things, equitable development. 
But no American mayor has the power or resources to finance most major new developments with public funds only, much less to have them publicly owned and operated. 
So Mamdani’s appointments are clearly an effort to promote more equitable development: a concierge service, so to speak, for one and all. 
With both Shorris (whose appointment was welcomed by both the traditional New York establishment and much of the city’s left) and Khan (whose appointment was welcomed by the left) at the helm, I suspect the city will see not just more high-rises, but more high-rises with affordable-unit quotas. 
I suspect we’ll see decent wages not just for the construction workers building the developments but for the retail clerks who staff their stores and the janitors who clean them. 
And if Meta wants a new office building or Amazon a new warehouse, they’re likely to encounter some standards for consumer and worker rights at odds with their low-road business models. 
This story first appeared in our free Today on TAP newsletter, a weekday email featuring commentary on the daily news from Prospect reporters. 
Even with wage standards and affordable set-asides and such, the EDC will still promote private-sector investment, for the rather basic reason that even cities with socialist mayors exist in a capitalist economy. 
The American city with the longest history of socialist governance, Milwaukee, saw its governing socialists develop the nation’s best roads, parks, and sewer systems, which enabled its privately owned factories and breweries to operate more efficiently. 
In the 1980s, the mayor of Burlington, Vermont, the once and future Bernie Sanders, had the city develop a waterfront park around which small businesses clustered and thrived. 
He funded free arts programs that led to the flourishing of cultural institutions and the in-migration of arts workers, and established a community land trust that boosted affordable housing. 
And over the past 15 years, the Labour Party mayor of Manchester, the largest city in Northern England, had the city take over the privately owned bus lines, producing a transit system that revitalized the city and helped his successful efforts to invite corporations that had previously shunned the city to build their headquarters there and bring the city’s center back to life. 
On Monday, that mayor, Andy Burnham, became the UK’s prime minister. 
Read: Can Prime Minister Burnham succeed? 
Mamdani is the well-versed heir to all his socialist or social democratic predecessors. 
Like them, he exists within a capitalist economy and society and brings to them the countervailing—but not exterminating—power of consumer, worker, community, and democratic values and interests. 
America’s socialist mayors have been particularly successful in creating public sector infrastructure and practices that boost small businesses; Mamdani has eliminated rules hampering sidewalk halal vendors and restaurateurs who want to serve ice cream. 
Socialists are elected by and govern in the real world. 
Historically, they governed American cities by enlarging a more egalitarian public sphere, which has given their residents more economic capacity and a more congenial environment to boost private investment as well. 
That’s why Lina Khan and Anthony Shorris will both be heading Zohran Mamdani’s EDC. 
The post Real-World Democratic Socialism appeared first on The American Prospect . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.9%Harold Meyerson: 13.2%The American Prospect: 5.6%Confirmation Bias15.9%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.6%The American Prospect: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Harold Meyerson: 2.9%The American Prospect: 2.2%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 19.9%Harold Meyerson: 2.5%The American Prospect: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic19.9%This article: 5.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.4%The American Prospect: 0.9%Hindsight Bias5.0%This article: 3.9%Harold Meyerson: 1.6%The American Prospect: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 0.4%Harold Meyerson: 2.5%The American Prospect: 4.7%Framing Effect0.4%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.5%The American Prospect: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.4%The American Prospect: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.8%Harold Meyerson: 3.8%The American Prospect: 1.4%Optimism Bias10.8%This article: 4.3%Harold Meyerson: 5.0%The American Prospect: 3.8%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 6.4%Harold Meyerson: 4.6%The American Prospect: 8.8%Negativity Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.5%The American Prospect: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Harold Meyerson: 4.3%The American Prospect: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.6%The American Prospect: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.0%The American Prospect: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 3.6%The American Prospect: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Harold Meyerson: 2.8%The American Prospect: 0.6%Halo Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.0%The American Prospect: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Harold Meyerson: 1.4%The American Prospect: 0.6%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 6.6%Harold Meyerson: 0.6%The American Prospect: 0.1%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.2%The American Prospect: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 4.6%The American Prospect: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 6.4%Harold Meyerson: 3.8%The American Prospect: 0.9%Straw Man6.4%This article: 8.9%Harold Meyerson: 2.2%The American Prospect: 1.7%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 8.6%Harold Meyerson: 4.3%The American Prospect: 2.1%False Dilemma8.6%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.9%The American Prospect: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.4%Harold Meyerson: 0.5%The American Prospect: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.4%This article: 15.2%Harold Meyerson: 13.6%The American Prospect: 6.5%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.1%The American Prospect: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.6%Harold Meyerson: 0.6%The American Prospect: 0.3%Bandwagon6.6%This article: 4.3%Harold Meyerson: 3.2%The American Prospect: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 2.5%Harold Meyerson: 1.9%The American Prospect: 0.9%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 25.1%Harold Meyerson: 6.9%The American Prospect: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)25.1%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.9%The American Prospect: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.8%The American Prospect: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.3%The American Prospect: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.7%Harold Meyerson: 1.4%The American Prospect: 0.2%Composition/Division4.7%This article: 16.5%Harold Meyerson: 8.8%The American Prospect: 2.7%Anecdotal16.5%This article: 1.4%Harold Meyerson: 0.6%The American Prospect: 0.2%No True Scotsman1.4%This article: 3.7%Harold Meyerson: 1.4%The American Prospect: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.4%The American Prospect: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.0%The American Prospect: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 1.7%The American Prospect: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.4%Harold Meyerson: 2.6%The American Prospect: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 11.9%Harold Meyerson: 19.0%The American Prospect: 9.9%Biased Writer Voice11.9%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 6.8%The American Prospect: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 17.9%Harold Meyerson: 8.6%The American Prospect: 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias17.9%This article: 0.0%Harold Meyerson: 0.8%The American Prospect: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Harold Meyerson: 1.4%The American Prospect: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.2%

722 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.