Topic summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Price Index results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,761 hits . Analysis detected 10,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,726 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,323 of 16,559 topics). This Consumer Price Index is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Consumer Price Index
Topic details
Total words: 11,726
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst