Author summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video1,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Malon results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,377 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (3,965 of 6,359 authors). This Claire Malon is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Claire Malon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠38%Claire Malon (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,377
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos