Author summary
61% 92 analyzed articles/videos 48,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Durden results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 26,876 hits . Analysis detected 280,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 236,045 analyzed words across 92 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,918 of 6,244 authors). This Tyler Durden is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Tyler Durden
Author details
Total words: 236,045
Article count: 92
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score92 analyzed articles236K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst