Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inflation Data results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 2,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,089 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (793 of 16,151 topics). This Inflation Data is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Inflation Data
Topic details
Total words: 1,089
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.1% percentile 12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 33.8% 33.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 44.0% 44.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 24.6% 24.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 44.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst