Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Fraud Exposed results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 5,061 hits . Analysis detected 42,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,629 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,806 of 35,675 keywords). This Minnesota Fraud Exposed is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Minnesota Fraud Exposed
Keyword details
Total words: 20,629
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.5% 24.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst