Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Mark Miller results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 3,392 hits . Analysis detected 31,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,245 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,223 of 6,137 authors). This Andrew Mark Miller is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Andrew Mark Miller
Author details
Total words: 31,245
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst