Author summary
0% 20 analyzed articles/videos 21,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Phillips results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 14,728 hits . Analysis detected 119,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 142,869 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,298 of 6,135 authors). This Morgan Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Morgan Phillips
Author details
Total words: 142,869
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score20 analyzed articles142.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst