Author summary
65% 22 analyzed articles/videos 30,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmine Baehr results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 14,419 hits . Analysis detected 97,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 101,320 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,746 of 6,595 authors). This Jasmine Baehr is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Jasmine Baehr
Author details
Total words: 101,320
Article count: 22
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score22 analyzed articles101.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst