Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 10,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Dorgan results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 5,363 hits . Analysis detected 40,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,632 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,944 of 6,135 authors). This Michael Dorgan is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Michael Dorgan
Author details
Total words: 47,632
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles47.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst