Author summary
76% 49 analyzed articles/videos 25,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Compton results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 14,444 hits . Analysis detected 111,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 106,366 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,432 of 6,162 authors). This Sophia Compton is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Sophia Compton
Author details
Total words: 106,366
Article count: 49
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score49 analyzed articles106.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst