Author summary
87% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Lawrence results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 2,291 hits . Analysis detected 14,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,820 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,869 of 6,628 authors). This Edward Lawrence is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Edward Lawrence
Author details
Total words: 11,820
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.4% 19.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst