Author summary
0% 29 analyzed articles/videos 21,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Mack results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 10,765 hits . Analysis detected 102,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 117,046 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,137 of 6,134 authors). This Eric Mack is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Eric Mack
Author details
Total words: 117,046
Article count: 29
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score29 analyzed articles117K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst