Author summary
74% 90 analyzed articles/videos 39,636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Revell results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 20,336 hits . Analysis detected 176,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 185,399 analyzed words across 90 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,753 of 6,169 authors). This Eric Revell is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Eric Revell
Author details
Total words: 185,399
Article count: 90
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score90 analyzed articles185.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst