Google expands Miami office as co-founders flee California for South Florida 29%

By Eric Revell74%

7/22/2026, 4:18:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 526 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,051 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

Google reportedly expanded its office presence in Miami this year after two of its co-founders purchased houses in South Florida. 
Alphabet, the parent company of Google, signed a lease expanding its existing 10,000-square-foot satellite office in Miami's financial district by an additional 45,000 square feet, two people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg News. 
The outlet reported that the expansion was driven in part by the recent home purchases in the area by Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin  two billionaires who have bought homes outside of California and relocated business entities out of the Golden State as voters weigh a billionaire tax on this fall's ballot. 
Google first opened an office in Miami in 2016 and the expansion will increase its presence in Florida  though the South Florida office remains much smaller than the corporate headquarters at its Mountain View campus in California, which has over 10 million square feet of space, and its 1.7 million-square-foot Hudson Square campus in New York. 
Page and Brin left their roles as executives in 2019 but remain on Google's board. 
Brin has reportedly taken an active role in shaping the company's initiatives around artificial intelligence (AI). 
A report from earlier this year by the Wall Street Journal noted that Page bought a waterfront compound for $101.5 million in December as well as a nearby home for $71.9 million, which he bought in early January, while Brin was reportedly closing in on a purchase at that time as well. 
Bloomberg's report said that Brin bought a $51 million waterfront home in Miami Beach shortly after Page's purchase. 
Brin was also linked to the purchase of a $42 million mansion on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe in December. 
The moves occurred as California voters will vote on a proposed one-time wealth tax on billionaires this November. 
The proposed constitutional amendment would levy a one-time, 5% wealth tax on taxpayers and trusts with over $1 billion in covered assets for the purpose of funding the state's healthcare and food assistance programs, as well as public education. 
Assets covered by the tax would include businesses, securities, art, collectibles, and intellectual property  though real property, pensions and certain retirement accounts would be exempt. 
If passed, the tax would apply retroactively to taxpayers who lived in California as of Jan. 1, 2026, with the tax due with 2027 tax filings. 
Taxpayers could pay the tax in five equal installments, with subsequent payments subject to an annual deferral charge of 7.5% of the balance that remains unpaid. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.7%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic11.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect16.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 13.1%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 21.4%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.0%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal9.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 32.5%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote32.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

434 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers24%attributed speech330writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBloomberg News • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWall Street Journal • 52 words • 100.0% coverageBloomberg News • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bloomberg News

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words50% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+88.8 ptsWriter: 11.2%Bloomberg News: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.