Keyword summary
22% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alphabet results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,804 hits . Analysis detected 12,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,790 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,451 of 34,833 keywords). This Alphabet is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Alphabet
Keyword details
Total words: 18,790
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst