Author summary
63% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jocelyn Noveck results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,509 hits . Analysis detected 14,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,944 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,349 of 6,628 authors). This Jocelyn Noveck is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Jocelyn Noveck
Author details
Total words: 12,944
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst