Author summary
28%8 analyzed articles/videos4,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlyn Huamani results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,637 hits. Analysis detected 12,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,437 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,780 of 6,316 authors). This Kaitlyn Huamani is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Kaitlyn Huamani
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
9%Kaitlyn Huamani (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,437
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate