Publication summary
20%2 analyzed articles/videos1,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NBC4 Washington results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 55% (181 of 398 publications). This NBC4 Washington is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
NBC4 Washington
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%inlander.com1%
55%NBC4 Washington (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 4,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate