Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff (Brooke Mallory) results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 1,451 hits . Analysis detected 6,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,053 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 93% (435 of 6,199 authors). This OAN Staff (Brooke Mallory) is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. OAN Staff (Brooke Mallory)
Author details
Total words: 3,053
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.0% percentile 8.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 47.5% 47.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 28.1% 28.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 42.9% 42.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 19.3% 19.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 47.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 42.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 28.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst