Author summary
0% 24 analyzed articles/videos 24,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Norman-Diamond results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 11,277 hits . Analysis detected 102,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 126,551 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,289 of 6,137 authors). This Greg Norman-Diamond is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Greg Norman-Diamond
Author details
Total words: 126,551
Article count: 24
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles126.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst